Mary Bartlet^{[1, 2]}

Abt 1669 - 1724  (55 years)    Has 7 ancestors and more than 100 descendants in this family tree.

• Name	Mary Bartlet
  Birth	Abt 1669
  Gender	Female
  Death	Nov 1724	Connecticut, USA
  Siblings	7 Siblings
  1. Elizabeth Bartlet,   b. 16 Mar 1653, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. 4 Oct 1742, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA  (Age 89 years) ▻ Abraham Fowler,  m. 29 Aug 1677   2. Mary Bartlet,   b. 1 Feb 1655, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. 5 Nov 1724, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA  (Age 69 years) ▻ Nathaniel Stone,  m. 10 Jul 1673   3. John Bartlet,   b. 9 Nov 1656, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. 16 Aug 1669, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA  (Age 12 years)   4. Hannah Bartlet,   b. 5 Nov 1658, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. Bolton, Connecticut, USA ▻ Stephen Bishop   5. Deborah Bartlet,   b. 1660   d. 4 Dec 1692, Newark, Essex, New Jersey, USA  (Age 32 years) ▻ John Spinning,  m. 16 Mar 1687   6. Daniel Bartlet,   b. 14 Dec 1665, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. 14 Nov 1747, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA  (Age 81 years) ▻ Sarah Meigs,  m. 11 Jan 1687 ;   Concurans Evans,  m. 11 Feb 1691 ;   Susannah,  m. 8 Oct 1707   7. Abraham Bartlet,   b. 19 Jan 1668, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. 20 Feb 1731, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA  (Age 63 years) ▻ Mary Warner,  m. 11 Jun 1693 + 8. Mary Bartlet,   b. Abt 1669   d. Nov 1724, Connecticut, USA  (Age 55 years) ▻ John Doud,  m. 15 Jan 1688
  Person ID	I204143	Geneagraphie
  Last Modified	7 Mar 2001

  
  

  Father	Deacon George Bartlet,   b. England d. 2 Aug 1669, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA
  Mother	Mary Cruttendon,   b. Bef 29 Apr 1632, Hawkhurst, Kent, England d. 11 Sep 1669, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA (Age 37 years)
  Marriage	14 Sep 1650	Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA
  Family ID	F83894	Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

  
  

  Family	John Doud,   b. 24 May 1650, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. Feb 1712, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA (Age 61 years)
  Marriage	15 Jan 1688	Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA
  Mary was from Kenilsworth and John from Gilford at the time of their marriage by Mr. Andrew Leete Justis. (F-78) They married on Jan. 2 or 15, 1687/88. The Barbour Collection says "Jan. about middle, 1687. " (F-502)
  Children	1. Mary Doude,   b. Oct 1688, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. Yes, date unknown   2. John Doud, Jr.,   b. 3 Feb 1691, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. 3 Sep 1745, Saybrook, New London CO, Connecticut, USA (Age 54 years)   3. Jacob Doud,   b. 3 Jan 1692, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. 18 Oct 1735, Middletown, Hartford, Connecticut, USA (Age 43 years) + 4. David Doude,   b. 15 Mar 1694, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. 6 Sep 1740, Middletown, Hartford, Connecticut, USA (Age 46 years)   5. Abraham Doude,   b. 1 Oct 1697, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. 9 Feb 1781 (Age 83 years)   6. Isaac Doud,   b. 30 Jun 1700, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. 1769, Middletown Twp, Middlesex Co., Connecticut, USA (Age 68 years)   7. Hannah Doude,   b. 8 May 1703, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. 20 Jan 1732 (Age 28 years)   8. Ebenezer Doud,   b. 3 Dec 1706, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. 1789 (Age 82 years)   9. Elizabeth Doude,   b. 4 May 1708, Guilford, New Haven Co., Connecticut, USA d. Yes, date unknown
  Family ID	F83797	Group Sheet  |  Family Chart
  Last Modified	7 Mar 2001

  
  

• Notes

  The Bartlet name is first found in England with an Adam Barttelot, Esq., who served under William the Conqueror and died in Co. Sussex in 1100 A.D. It is not known how our Mary ties into the lineage that I have under record number F-531. It is conjecture at this point, who Mary's parents are. A Mormon Ancestral file record gives her birthdate as Sept. 11, 1669 of Guilford, New Haven, CT. It also states that she is the daughter of George and Mary Cruttenden Bartlett. However, upon checking the Barbour Collection which is an excellent second hand index made of the vital records for Connecticut, Mary's birthdate is not in them. This birthdate is likely a misinterpretation of Mary Crittendon Bartlett's burial date which is listed as bd, Sept. 11, 1669. In the Barbour Collection, bd means burial date. However, I still find the most proof supporting the belief that Mary is the daughter of Mary Crittendon and George Bartlet and likely to have been born near her mother's death. First, our Mary was from Kenilsworth/Killingworth at the time of her marriage, a town ten miles Northeast of Guilford Twp., Connecticut where George and Mary had lived. In fact, Kenilsworth/Killingworth abutted Guilford, divided by the Hammosett (River?), which had an original size ten miles in length. (F-503) Another child of George and Mary Bartlett also lived in Killingworth at the time, Daniel Bartlett. The fact that Mary is not in the vital records as the child of Mary and George Bartlet is also not surprising. Another daughter tied to George and Mary in Talcott was not placed in the town records either, i.e. Deborah, until her marriage. (F-499) There is also one more unaccounted for female Bartlett that was only in the vital records at the time of her marriage, that is also highly likely to be the daughter of George and Mary. A Judeth Bartlet married John Boyd on Mar. 28, 1676/7 in Killingworth, CT. (F-502) So what we have is only one Bartlet, Deacon George Bartlet, living in the Guilford/Killingworth area of an age appropriate to be the father of all the other Bartlet's known living in the area. Our Mary, Deborah and a Judeth are listed in the marriage records, but were not recorded in the birth vital records as the daughters of George. Also note that all three of these ladies had their last name spelled the same as George's name was spelled, Bartlet. It is my belief that these daughters had to be daughters of George and Mary Cruttendon Bartlet. Since both these parents died while having young children, it seems likely that recording of their births was simply not made. (F-463) The only other Bartlets in Connecticut at the time that could be parents to these young ladies all lived in Hartford County, CT. Their surnames were consistently spelled Bartlett with 2 tt's, unlike the Bartlet's of the Guilford/Killingworth area. John Bartlett of Windsor Twp, Hartford (m.1641?) (One researcher believes she is descended from a John, perhaps this one??? (F-477); Benjamin and Deborah Bartlett of Winsdor, Hartford (m.1665); Esaya (Isiah) & Abia Bartlett of Windsor Twp., Hartford (m.1663); Josia Bartlett of Windsor, Hartford (m.1664?); Robert and Ann Bartlett of Hartford, Hartford (m.1643?) (F-332); and Edward Bartlett (d. 1676) in Windsor leaving a will, (F-504). I have checked the Barbour collection for a Mary, Deborah or Judeth Bartlet, being born to any of these, and have not found them in the vital records for these families either. (F-502) As far as our Mary goes, it is true that if she was the daughter of George and Mary Bartlet as seems likely from time and place, she was the second living daughter of theirs to be named Mary. This would have been possible, if she had been born near her mother's death. Multiple children were given the same names in a family in the history of England. It still would seem possible in this time period, if Mary had been named to honor a dying mother.

  
  

• Sources

  [S403] Clarence Almon Torrey, New England Marriages Prior to 1700, (Genealogical Publishing Co, Baltimore, MD 1985 ,), V.3 & 4 . [S1328] Barbour, Lucius Barnes, Barbour Collection of Conn. Vital Records, (98 rolls of microfilm).